#newyork - Law Offices of Robert Wayne Pearce

Dec 23, 2020

Purchase, New York FINRA Securities Arbitration Lawyer

Did Morgan Stanley Cause You Investment Losses? Morgan Stanley submitted a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent to the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority for allegedly failing to reasonably supervise a registered representative in violation of NASD Rule 3010 and FINRA Rules 3110 and 2010. Due to the misconduct, the firm was censured and fined $175,000. Since 2009, Morgan Stanley has been a FINRA member firm and has more than 23,000 registered representatives. According to FINRA, between January 2012 through December 2017, Morgan Stanley had allegedly failed to supervise a representative who had been accused of recommending unsuitable short-term trades and securities in 10 customers’ accounts. During the relevant period, Morgan Stanley had automated alerts set up to identify trading activity in accounts that needed to be reviewed by a supervisor and which accounts exceeded certain turnover and cost-to-equity ratios. The findings stated that the trading conducted in the customers’ accounts generated multiple red flags and Morgan Stanley allegedly failed to take reasonable steps to ensure the recommendations were suitable. As a result of the unsuitable trading, the customers suffered losses of more than $900,000 and Morgan Stanley was ordered to pay $774,574.08 in restitution. FINRA Rule 3110 and its predecessor, NASD Rule 3010, require that each member firm take reasonable steps to ensure that the activities of each associated person comply with applicable securities laws and regulations, investigate red flags of potential misconduct, and take appropriate action when misconduct has occurred. A violation of FINRA Rule 3110 or NASD Rule 3010 also constitutes a violation of FINRA Rule 2010. Do You Need a New York FINRA Securities Arbitration Attorney? Are you a Purchase, New York investor who has suffered significant losses in your stock brokerage and investment accounts? Did your New York stockbroker or investment advisor misrepresent facts, fail to disclose facts making the statements made false and misleading, recommend unsuitable investments or strategies, excessively trade or churn, mismanage your investment account or engage in other kinds of stockbroker misconduct? If so, you need representation by an experienced, highly-rated and nationally recognized FINRA securities arbitration attorney—a lawyer who knows FINRA rules and procedures inside and out and how to handle these FINRA arbitration cases as well as other complex legal issues. Free Initial Consultation With Experienced FINRA Securities Arbitration Lawyers Serving Purchase, New York Residents In FINRA Arbitration Proceedings At The Law Offices of Robert Wayne Pearce, P.A. we represent investors in all kinds of securities, commodities and investment law disputes in FINRA, AAA and JAMS arbitration and mediation proceedings. Attorney Pearce and his staff represent investors throughout New York, and across the United States on a CONTINGENCY FEE basis which means you pay nothing – NO FEES-NO COSTS – unless we put money in your pocket after receiving a settlement or FINRA arbitration award. Se habla español For dedicated representation by Attorney Pearce with over 40 years of experience and success in all kinds of securities, commodities and investment law disputes serving New York citizens, contact the firm by phone at 561-338-0037, toll free at 800-732-2889 or via e-mail.

Dec 22, 2020

Hicksville, New York FINRA 8210 Defense Lawyers

Did Christ Elias Baltas Cause You Investment Losses? You may have read that Christ Elias Baltas of Hicksville, New York was permanently barred by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) from working in the securities industry because he failed to comply with FINRA Rules 8210 and 2010. In December 2015, Christ Elias Baltas joined Worden Capital Management LLC and was registered as a General Securities Representative, General Securities Principal, and Operations Professional. According to the findings, FINRA began an investigation regarding his supervision over a representatives potential unsuitable recommendations. The findings stated that FINRA sent a request to Baltas to appear for on-the-record testimony regarding the allegations which he allegedly acknowledged, received, and refused to appear at any time. Although Christ Alias Baltas is no longer registered with any FINRA member firm, he remains subject to FINRA’s jurisdiction. FINRA Rule 8210(a)(1) states, in relevant part, that FINRA may “require a member, person associated with a member, or any other person subject to FINRA’s jurisdiction to testify at a location specified by FINRA staff with respect to any matter involved in [a FINRA] investigation” FINRA Rule 8210(c) further states that “no person shall fail to provide testimony pursuant to this Rule.” A violation of FINRA Rule 8210 is also a violation of FINRA Rule 2010, which requires member firms and their associated persons to “observe high standards of commercial honor and just and equitable principles of trade.” Do You Need a New York FINRA Defense Attorney? Unfortunately, Christ Elias Baltas might have avoided that FINRA 8210 bar from the securities industry with a skilled and experienced FINRA 8210 defense attorney. It is important, early on, to have a FINRA defense attorney advise you on how not to make matters worse and resolve the dispute with the least amount of sanctions which could range from censures to fines, suspensions, permanent bars, and/or referrals to federal or state prosecutors. You will need an experienced FINRA defense lawyer who not only has knowledge of FINRA rules and procedures, the securities laws and the appropriate sanction for the alleged misconduct but also has an excellent reputation and credibility with the FINRA attorneys to negotiate the best outcome. Free Initial Consultation With FINRA 8210 Defense Attorney Serving Financial Advisors Throughout Hicksville, New York And Nationwide The Law Offices of Robert Wayne Pearce, P.A. understands what is at stake in FINRA securities law matters and works tirelessly to secure the best possible result for you and your case. Attorney Pearce’s FINRA defense skills are highly regarded throughout New York and across the nation. For dedicated representation by an attorney with over 40 years of experience and success in all kinds of FINRA disputes serving New York citizens, contact the firm by phone at 561-338-0037, toll free at 800-732-2889, or via e-mail.

Dec 22, 2020

New York, New York Securities Account Theft Attorney

Did Andrew Markman Arthur Cause You Investment Losses? Andrew Markman Arthur of New York, New York was permanently barred by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) for the allegedly converting funds and providing false information in violation of FINRA Rules 8210 and 2010. Although Arthur is not associated with a FINRA-regulated broker-dealer and remains subject to FINRA’s jurisdiction. Since November of 1991, Andrew Markman Arthur has been registered as General Securities Representative (GSR) and General Securities Principal (GP) with 11 different firms. During the relevant period between October 2016 and September 2019, Arthur had allegedly converted $275,000 given to him by a relative and provided false information to FINRA during an investigation. According to the FINRA findings, the relative sent the money to Arthur to be invested in an employee program of private placement offerings that did not really exist. The findings further stated that Arthur had allegedly used the $275,000 for his own personal use, concealed the conversion from his relative and falsely attested that he “borrowed” the money to pay for living expenses while under investigation. Do you need a New York FINRA Securities Arbitration Attorney? Are you a New York, New York investor who has suffered significant losses in your stock brokerage and investment accounts? Did your New York stockbroker or investment advisor transfer assets without your authority to the stockbroker or another party, steal, or otherwise commit theft in your investment account? If so, you will need to have representation from an experienced, highly rated, and nationally recognized FINRA arbitration securities law attorney—an attorney who knows FINRA rules and procedures inside and out and how to handle these FINRA arbitration forgery cases and other complex legal issues. Free Initial Consultation With Experienced Attorneys Handling Securities Account Theft Cases Serving New York, New York Residents in FINRA Arbitrations At The Law Offices of Robert Wayne Pearce, P.A. we represent investors in all kinds of securities, commodities, and investment law disputes in FINRA, AAA and JAMS arbitration and mediation proceedings. Attorney Pearce and his staff represent investors throughout New York, and across the United States on a CONTINGENCY FEE basis which means you pay nothing – NO FEES-NO COSTS – unless we put money in your pocket after receiving a settlement or FINRA arbitration award. Se habla español For dedicated representation by Attorney Pearce with over 40 years of experience and success in all kinds of securities, commodities, and investment law disputes serving New York citizens, contact the firm by phone at 561-338-0037, toll free at 800-732-2889 or via e-mail.

Dec 10, 2020

New York FINRA Securities Arbitration Attorney

Did Michael Finn Coomes Jr. Cause You Investment Losses? Michael Finn Coomes Jr. of Phoenix, New York was fined $5,000 and suspended from association with any FINRA member for a period of 15 business days for allegedly exercising discretion without authorization. Without admitting or denying the allegations, Michael Finn Coomes Jr. consented to the sanctions. The suspension was in effect from September 21, 2020, through October 9, 2020. In March 2003, Michael Finn Coomes joined Cadaret Grant and was registered as a General Securities Representative, a General Securities Principal, and an Investment Company and Variable Contracts Products Representative. According to the FINRA findings, Coomes effected trades in 24 customers accounts without their written authorization or approval from his member firm. The findings stated that the trades were based on the customers verbal approval to exercise discretionary trading in their accounts more than three days prior to the transactions. Without the written authorization or approval from Cadaret, Mr. Coomes violated NASD Rule 2510(b) and FINRA Rule 2010. NASD Rule 2510(b) prohibits registered representatives from “exercising any discretionary power in a customer’s account” unless the customer has provided prior written authorization to the representative and the account has been accepted as a discretionary account, in writing, by the representative’s member firm. A violation of NASD Rule 2510(b) is also a violation of FINRA Rule 2010. Do You Need A New York FINRA Securities Arbitration Attorney? Are you a New York investor who has suffered significant losses in your stock brokerage and investment accounts? Did your New York stockbroker or investment advisor misrepresent facts, fail to disclose facts making the statements made false and misleading, recommend unsuitable investments or strategies, excessively trade or churn, mismanage your investment account or engage in other kinds of stockbroker misconduct? If so, you need representation by an experienced, highly-rated and nationally recognized FINRA securities arbitration attorney—a lawyer who knows FINRA rules and procedures inside and out and how to handle these FINRA arbitration cases as well as other complex legal issues. Free Initial Consultation With Experienced FINRA Securities Arbitration Attorneys Serving New York Residents In FINRA Arbitration Proceedings At The Law Offices of Robert Wayne Pearce, P.A. we represent investors in all kinds of securities, commodities and investment law disputes in FINRA, AAA and JAMS arbitration and mediation proceedings. Attorney Pearce and his staff represent investors throughout New York, and across the United States on a CONTINGENCY FEE basis which means you pay nothing – NO FEES-NO COSTS – unless we put money in your pocket after receiving a settlement or FINRA arbitration award. Se habla español For dedicated representation by Attorney Pearce with over 40 years of experience and success in all kinds of securities, commodities and investment law disputes serving New York citizens, contact the firm by phone at 561-338-0037, toll free at 800-732-2889 or via e-mail.

Dec 9, 2020

New York FINRA 8210 Defense Lawyers

Did Forouzan Pooladi Cause You Investment Losses? You may have read that Forouzan Pooladi of Port Washington, New York was permanently barred by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) from working in the securities industry because she failed to comply with FINRA Rule 8210. Forouzan Pooladi joined J.P. Morgan Securities LLC in May 2016 and was registered as an Investment Company Shares and Variable Contracts Representative. On October 4, 2019, the firm filed a Uniform Termination Notice for Securities Industry Registration (Form U5) indicating that Pooladi was terminated due to an alleged violation of bank policy and unauthorized transactions. According to the findings, FINRA began an investigation regarding the misconduct and requested information and documentation from Poolandi. FINRA stated that Pooladi initially cooperated then later acknowledged that she received FINRA’s request and allegedly refused to produce the requested documents. Although she is no longer associated with a FINRA member firm, Forouzan Pooladi remains subject to FINRA’s jurisdiction. FINRA Rule 8210(a) states, in relevant part, that FINRA has the right to “require a person associated with a member, or any other person subject to FINRA’s jurisdiction to provide information in writing or electronically with respect to any matter involved in the investigation, complaint, examination or proceeding.” FINRA Rule 8210(c) similarly provides that “[n]o member or person shall fail to provide information pursuant to this Rule.” Do you need a New York FINRA 8210 Defense Lawyer? Unfortunately, Forouzan Poolandi might have avoided that FINRA 8210 bar from the securities industry with a skilled and experienced FINRA 8210 defense attorney. It is important, early on, to have a FINRA defense attorney advise you on how not to make matters worse and resolve the dispute with the least amount of sanctions which could range from censures to fines, suspensions, permanent bars, and/or referrals to federal or state prosecutors. You will need an experienced FINRA defense lawyer who not only has knowledge of FINRA rules and procedures, the securities laws and the appropriate sanction for the alleged misconduct but also has an excellent reputation and credibility with the FINRA attorneys to negotiate the best outcome. Free Initial Consultation With FINRA 8210 Defense Attorney Serving Financial Advisors Throughout New York And Nationwide The Law Offices of Robert Wayne Pearce, P.A. understands what is at stake in FINRA securities law matters and works tirelessly to secure the best possible result for you and your case. Attorney Pearce’s FINRA defense skills are highly regarded throughout New York and across the nation. For dedicated representation by an attorney with over 40 years of experience and success in all kinds of FINRA disputes serving New York citizens, contact the firm by phone at 561-338-0037, toll free at 800-732-2889, or via e-mail.

Nov 12, 2020

FINRA Complaint filed against SW Financial Stockbroker William James W. Flower for Misconduct

James W. Flower of Melville, New York was named respondent of a FINRA complaint alleging that he allegedly churned/excessively traded customer’s accounts in violation Section 10(b) of the securities Exchange Securities Act of 1934, Rule 10b-5 and FINRA Rules 4511, 2111, 2020 and 2010. From January 1, 2016 and July 31, 2018, James W. Flower was registered with SW Financial as a General Securities Representative. According to the FINRA findings, Flower allegedly exercised de-facto control in five customer accounts without authorization or approval which resulted in excessive and quantitatively unsuitable trading. The FINRA findings stated that the trading made it near impossible for any customers to make a profit due to the cost-to-equity ratios, high annualized turnover rates, losses totaling over $220,000. In addition, FINRA’s complaint further alleges that Flower received more than $210,000 in commissions and fees and caused his firm’s books and records to be inaccurate by mismarking the transactions as unsolicited. James William Flower is currently registered with FINRA and is therefore subject to FINRA’s jurisdiction. Churning is a manipulative and deceptive device that violates Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act, Securities Exchange Act Rule 10b-5, and FINRA Rules 2020 and 2010. It is fraudulent conduct that occurs in a broker-customer relationship when (i) a broker controls his customer’s account; (ii) the trading in the account is excessive in light of the customer’s investment objectives; and (iii) the broker acts with scienter, i.e., with intent to defraud or with reckless disregard of the customer’s interests. Stockbrokers have been known to engage in many practices that may violate industry and firm rules, practices, and procedures. In order to protect investors from stockbroker misconduct, FINRA rules require brokerage firms to establish and implement a supervisory system. The implementation of these industry rules requires supervisors to monitor their employees to ensure compliance with federal and state securities laws, securities industry rules and regulations, and the brokerage firm’s own policies and procedures. If broker-dealers and/or their supervisors fail to establish and implement these protective measures, they may be liable to investors for damages which flow from the broker’s misconduct. Therefore, investors who have suffered losses stemming from churning/excessive trading and/or other misconduct by their broker can file claims to recover damages against broker-dealers, like SW Financial, which should consistently oversee its brokers’ activities in order to prevent the above-described misconduct. Have you suffered losses in your SW Financial account due to churning/excessive trading by your broker? If so, call Robert Pearce at the Law Offices of Robert Wayne Pearce, P.A. for a free consultation. Mr. Pearce is accepting clients with valid claims against SW Financial stockbrokers who may have engaged in broker misconduct and caused investors’ losses. The most important of investors’ rights is the right to be informed! This Investors’ Rights blog post is by the Law Offices of Robert Wayne Pearce, P.A., located in Boca Raton, Florida. For over 40 years, Attorney Pearce has tried, arbitrated, and mediated hundreds of disputes involving complex securities, commodities and investment law issues. The lawyers at our law firm are devoted to protecting investors’ rights throughout the United States and internationally! Please visit our website, www.secatty.com, post a comment, call (800) 732-2889, or email Mr. Pearce at pearce@rwpearce.com for answers to any of your questions about this blog post and/or any related matter.

Nov 12, 2020

Worden Capital Management Stockbroker David Weisberg Suspended for Excessive & Unsuitable Trading

David Weisberg of Brooklyn, New York submitted a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent (AWC) to the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) in which he was fined and suspended for allegedly engaging in excessive and unsuitable trading in violation of NASD Rule 2510(b) and FINRA Rules 2111 and 2010. From 2016 to 2019, David Weisberg was registered with Worden Capital Management as a general securities representative. According to the FINRA findings, Weisberg persuaded a seventy-three-year old customer to open a margin account and made certain recommendations that involved in-and-out trading. The FINRA findings stated that Weisberg allegedly used discretion in the customer’s account, made twenty-one unauthorized transactions and failed to track the trading costs or take them into consideration. In addition, due to the excessive and unsuitable trading the customer lost approximately $55,627, while Weisberg received commissions of $75,638. Without admitting or denying FINRA’s findings, David Weisberg was assessed a deferred fine of $7,500, suspended from association with any FINRA member in all capacities for 11 months, ordered to pay deferred disgorgement in the amount of $55,627, plus interest, ordered to pay deferred disgorgement of commissions received in the amount of $20,011, plus interest, and required to complete 10 hours of continuing education about excessive trading. The suspension is in effect from May 4, 2020, through April 3, 2021. FINRA Rule 2111 requires associated persons who control a customer’s account to have a reasonable basis for believing that any series of recommended securities transactions, taken together, is not excessive and unsuitable for the customer in light of his or her investment profile, which includes factors such as risk tolerance and time horizon. While no single metric determines whether trading is excessive, trading has often been deemed excessive if its cost-to-equity ratio is greater than twenty percent. NASD Rule 2510(b) prohibits registered persons from “exercising any discretionary power in a customer’s account unless such customer has given prior written authorization to a stated individual or individuals and the account has been accepted by the member.” Stockbrokers have been known to engage in many practices that may violate industry and firm rules, practices, and procedures. In order to protect investors from stockbroker misconduct, FINRA rules require brokerage firms to establish and implement a supervisory system. The implementation of these industry rules requires supervisors to monitor their employees to ensure compliance with federal and state securities laws, securities industry rules and regulations, and the brokerage firm’s own policies and procedures. If broker-dealers and/or their supervisors fail to establish and implement these protective measures, they may be liable to investors for damages which flow from the broker’s misconduct. Therefore, investors who have suffered losses stemming from excessive and unsuitable trading and/or other misconduct by their broker can file claims to recover damages against broker-dealers, like Worden Capital Management, which should consistently oversee its brokers’ activities in order to prevent the above-described misconduct. Have you suffered losses in your Worden Capital Management account due to excessive & unsuitable trading by your broker? Was David Weisberg your stockbroker? If so, call Robert Pearce at the Law Offices of Robert Wayne Pearce, P.A. for a free consultation. Mr. Pearce is accepting clients with valid claims against Worden Capital Management stockbrokers who may have engaged in broker misconduct and caused investors’ losses. The most important of investors’ rights is the right to be informed! This Investors’ Rights blog post is by the Law Offices of Robert Wayne Pearce, P.A., located in Boca Raton, Florida. For over 40 years, Attorney Pearce has tried, arbitrated, and mediated hundreds of disputes involving complex securities, commodities and investment law issues. The lawyers at our law firm are devoted to protecting investors’ rights throughout the United States and internationally! Please visit our website, www.secatty.com, post a comment, call (800) 732-2889, or email Mr. Pearce at pearce@rwpearce.com for answers to any of your questions about this blog post and/or any related matter.

Nov 11, 2020

Former NYLife Securities IR Piero B. DiLorenzo Barred for Misconduct

Piero B. DiLorenzo of Glen Cove, New York submitted a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent (AWC) to the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) in which he was barred for failing to appear for on-the-record testimony in violation of FINRA Rules 8210 and 2010. From February 2014 to July 2019, Piero B. DiLorenzo was registered with NYLife Securities as an Investment Company and Variable Contracts Products Representative (IR). According to the FINRA findings, NYLife Securities filed a Form U5 disclosing DiLorenzo’s termination due to alleged unauthorized trading. In March 2020, FINRA sent a request to DiLorenzo to appear for on-the-record testimony regarding whether he submitted eight electronic variable annuity applications and other documents without customer authorization. The FINRA findings stated that DiLorenzo acknowledged that he received the Rule 8210 request but ultimately refused to appear for on-the-record testimony. Piero B. DiLorenzo is no longer associated with any FINRA member firm but remains under FINRA’s jurisdiction. FINRA Rule 8210(a)(1) states in relevant part that FINRA has the right to “require a person associated with a member, or any person subject to FINRA’s jurisdiction to provide information orally, in writing or electronically” FINRA Rule 8210(c) similarly provides that “[n]o member or person shall fail to provide information pursuant to this Rule.” A failure to comply with a request for information pursuant to FINRA Rule 8210, is a violation of FINRA Rule 2010, which requires associated persons to “observe high standards of commercial honor and just and equitable principles of trade.” Without admitting or denying FINRA’s findings, Piero B. DiLorenzo has been barred from association with any FINRA member in all capacities. Stockbrokers have been known to engage in many practices that may violate industry and firm rules, practices, and procedures. In order to protect investors from stockbroker misconduct, FINRA rules require brokerage firms to establish and implement a supervisory system. The implementation of these industry rules requires supervisors to monitor their employees to ensure compliance with federal and state securities laws, securities industry rules and regulations, and the brokerage firm’s own policies and procedures. If broker-dealers and/or their supervisors fail to establish and implement these protective measures, they may be liable to investors for damages which flow from the broker’s misconduct. Therefore, investors who have suffered losses stemming from misconduct by their broker can file claims to recover damages against broker-dealers, like NYLife Securities, which should consistently oversee its brokers’ activities in order to prevent the above-described misconduct. Have you suffered losses in your NYLife Securities account due to misconduct by your broker? Was Piero B. DiLorenzo your stockbroker? If so, call Robert Pearce at the Law Offices of Robert Wayne Pearce, P.A. for a free consultation. Mr. Pearce is accepting clients with valid claims against NYLife Securities stockbrokers who may have engaged in broker misconduct and caused investors’ losses. The most important of investors’ rights is the right to be informed! This Investors’ Rights blog post is by the Law Offices of Robert Wayne Pearce, P.A., located in Boca Raton, Florida. For over 40 years, Attorney Pearce has tried, arbitrated, and mediated hundreds of disputes involving complex securities, commodities and investment law issues. The lawyers at our law firm are devoted to protecting investors’ rights throughout the United States and internationally! Please visit our website, www.secatty.com, post a comment, call (800) 732-2889, or email Mr. Pearce at pearce@rwpearce.com for answers to any of your questions about this blog post and/or any related matter.

Nov 10, 2020

Former Dawson James and Spartan Securities Stockbroker Mack Leon Miller Suspended for Unsuitable Recommendations and Excessive Trading

Mack Leon Miller of Brooklyn, New York submitted a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent (AWC) to the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) in which he was fined and suspended for allegedly making unsuitable recommendations and participating in excessive trading in a customer’s account in violation of FINRA Rules 2111 and 2010. In 2017, Mr. Miller was registered as a General Securities Representative (GSR) with both Dawson James Securities and then Spartan Capital Securities. According to the FINRA findings, during his time of employment with Dawson James and Spartan, Mr. Miller allegedly made unsuitable recommendations and engaged in excessive trading in a customer’s account. The findings stated that the customer lacked knowledge as an investor and followed all of Mr. Miller’s recommendations. Due to mounting commissions and fees, it became impossible for the customer to benefit from the exchange. Mr. Miller’s alleged excessive trading, including the commissions and margin interest, caused the customer to lose $69,633. FINRA Rule 2111(a) provides in pertinent part that “(a) member or an associated person must have a reasonable basis to believe that a recommenced transaction or investment strategy involving a security or securities is suitable for the customer, based on the information obtained through the reasonable diligence of the member or associated person to ascertain the customer’s investment profile.” As explained in Supplementary Material 2111.05(c): A violation of FINRA 2111 also constitutes a violation of FINRA Rule 2010, which required associated persons to observe high standards of commercial honor and just and equitable principles of trade in the conduct of their business. Without admitting or denying FINRA’s findings, Mack Leon Miller was assessed a deferred fine of $2,500 plus interest in partial restitution to the customer and suspended from association with any FINRA member in all capacities for five months. The suspension was in effect from May 4, 2020, through October 3, 2020. Stockbrokers have been known to engage in many practices that may violate industry and firm rules, practices, and procedures. In order to protect investors from stockbroker misconduct, FINRA rules require brokerage firms to establish and implement a supervisory system. The implementation of these industry rules requires supervisors to monitor their employees to ensure compliance with federal and state securities laws, securities industry rules and regulations, and the brokerage firm’s own policies and procedures. If broker-dealers and/or their supervisors fail to establish and implement these protective measures, they may be liable to investors for damages which flow from the broker’s misconduct. Therefore, investors who have suffered losses stemming from excessive trading, and/or unsuitable recommendations by their broker can file claims to recover damages against broker-dealers, like Dawson James and Spartan, which should consistently oversee its brokers’ activities in order to prevent the above-described misconduct. Have you suffered losses in your Dawson James and Spartan account due to excessive trading and/or unsuitable recommendations by your broker? Was Mack Leon Miller your stockbroker? If so, call Robert Pearce at the Law Offices of Robert Wayne Pearce, P.A. for a free consultation. Mr. Pearce is accepting clients with valid claims against Dawson James and Spartan stockbrokers who may have engaged in broker misconduct and caused investors’ losses. The most important of investors’ rights is the right to be informed! This Investors’ Rights blog post is by the Law Offices of Robert Wayne Pearce, P.A., located in Boca Raton, Florida. For over 40 years, Attorney Pearce has tried, arbitrated, and mediated hundreds of disputes involving complex securities, commodities and investment law issues. The lawyers at our law firm are devoted to protecting investors’ rights throughout the United States and internationally! Please visit our website, www.secatty.com, post a comment, call (800) 732-2889, or email Mr. Pearce at pearce@rwpearce.com for answers to any of your questions about this blog post and/or any related matter.