113 search results found for “Capital Financial Unsuitable Investment Lawyer”

Worden Capital Management Stockbroker David Weisberg Suspended for Excessive & Unsuitable Trading

David Weisberg of Brooklyn, New York submitted a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent (AWC) to the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) in which he was fined and suspended for allegedly engaging in excessive and unsuitable trading in violation of NASD Rule 2510(b) and FINRA Rules 2111 and 2010. From 2016 to 2019, David Weisberg was registered with Worden Capital Management as a general securities representative. According to the FINRA findings, Weisberg persuaded a seventy-three-year old customer to open a margin account and made certain recommendations that involved in-and-out trading. The FINRA findings stated that Weisberg allegedly used discretion in the customer’s account, made twenty-one unauthorized transactions and failed to track the trading costs or take them into consideration. In addition, due to the excessive and unsuitable trading the customer lost approximately $55,627, while Weisberg received commissions of $75,638. Without admitting or denying FINRA’s findings, David Weisberg was assessed a deferred fine of $7,500, suspended from association with any FINRA member in all capacities for 11 months, ordered to pay deferred disgorgement in the amount of $55,627, plus interest, ordered to pay deferred disgorgement of commissions received in the amount of $20,011, plus interest, and required to complete 10 hours of continuing education about excessive trading. The suspension is in effect from May 4, 2020, through April 3, 2021. FINRA Rule 2111 requires associated persons who control a customer’s account to have a reasonable basis for believing that any series of recommended securities transactions, taken together, is not excessive and unsuitable for the customer in light of his or her investment profile, which includes factors such as risk tolerance and time horizon. While no single metric determines whether trading is excessive, trading has often been deemed excessive if its cost-to-equity ratio is greater than twenty percent. NASD Rule 2510(b) prohibits registered persons from “exercising any discretionary power in a customer’s account unless such customer has given prior written authorization to a stated individual or individuals and the account has been accepted by the member.” Stockbrokers have been known to engage in many practices that may violate industry and firm rules, practices, and procedures. In order to protect investors from stockbroker misconduct, FINRA rules require brokerage firms to establish and implement a supervisory system. The implementation of these industry rules requires supervisors to monitor their employees to ensure compliance with federal and state securities laws, securities industry rules and regulations, and the brokerage firm’s own policies and procedures. If broker-dealers and/or their supervisors fail to establish and implement these protective measures, they may be liable to investors for damages which flow from the broker’s misconduct. Therefore, investors who have suffered losses stemming from excessive and unsuitable trading and/or other misconduct by their broker can file claims to recover damages against broker-dealers, like Worden Capital Management, which should consistently oversee its brokers’ activities in order to prevent the above-described misconduct. Have you suffered losses in your Worden Capital Management account due to excessive & unsuitable trading by your broker? Was David Weisberg your stockbroker? If so, call Robert Pearce at the Law Offices of Robert Wayne Pearce, P.A. for a free consultation. Mr. Pearce is accepting clients with valid claims against Worden Capital Management stockbrokers who may have engaged in broker misconduct and caused investors’ losses. The most important of investors’ rights is the right to be informed! This Investors’ Rights blog post is by the Law Offices of Robert Wayne Pearce, P.A., located in Boca Raton, Florida. For over 40 years, Attorney Pearce has tried, arbitrated, and mediated hundreds of disputes involving complex securities, commodities and investment law issues. The lawyers at our law firm are devoted to protecting investors’ rights throughout the United States and internationally! Please visit our website, www.secatty.com, post a comment, call (800) 732-2889, or email Mr. Pearce at pearce@rwpearce.com for answers to any of your questions about this blog post and/or any related matter.

Continue Reading

Former Dawson James and Spartan Securities Stockbroker Mack Leon Miller Suspended for Unsuitable Recommendations and Excessive Trading

Mack Leon Miller of Brooklyn, New York submitted a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent (AWC) to the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) in which he was fined and suspended for allegedly making unsuitable recommendations and participating in excessive trading in a customer’s account in violation of FINRA Rules 2111 and 2010. In 2017, Mr. Miller was registered as a General Securities Representative (GSR) with both Dawson James Securities and then Spartan Capital Securities. According to the FINRA findings, during his time of employment with Dawson James and Spartan, Mr. Miller allegedly made unsuitable recommendations and engaged in excessive trading in a customer’s account. The findings stated that the customer lacked knowledge as an investor and followed all of Mr. Miller’s recommendations. Due to mounting commissions and fees, it became impossible for the customer to benefit from the exchange. Mr. Miller’s alleged excessive trading, including the commissions and margin interest, caused the customer to lose $69,633. FINRA Rule 2111(a) provides in pertinent part that “(a) member or an associated person must have a reasonable basis to believe that a recommenced transaction or investment strategy involving a security or securities is suitable for the customer, based on the information obtained through the reasonable diligence of the member or associated person to ascertain the customer’s investment profile.” As explained in Supplementary Material 2111.05(c): A violation of FINRA 2111 also constitutes a violation of FINRA Rule 2010, which required associated persons to observe high standards of commercial honor and just and equitable principles of trade in the conduct of their business. Without admitting or denying FINRA’s findings, Mack Leon Miller was assessed a deferred fine of $2,500 plus interest in partial restitution to the customer and suspended from association with any FINRA member in all capacities for five months. The suspension was in effect from May 4, 2020, through October 3, 2020. Stockbrokers have been known to engage in many practices that may violate industry and firm rules, practices, and procedures. In order to protect investors from stockbroker misconduct, FINRA rules require brokerage firms to establish and implement a supervisory system. The implementation of these industry rules requires supervisors to monitor their employees to ensure compliance with federal and state securities laws, securities industry rules and regulations, and the brokerage firm’s own policies and procedures. If broker-dealers and/or their supervisors fail to establish and implement these protective measures, they may be liable to investors for damages which flow from the broker’s misconduct. Therefore, investors who have suffered losses stemming from excessive trading, and/or unsuitable recommendations by their broker can file claims to recover damages against broker-dealers, like Dawson James and Spartan, which should consistently oversee its brokers’ activities in order to prevent the above-described misconduct. Have you suffered losses in your Dawson James and Spartan account due to excessive trading and/or unsuitable recommendations by your broker? Was Mack Leon Miller your stockbroker? If so, call Robert Pearce at the Law Offices of Robert Wayne Pearce, P.A. for a free consultation. Mr. Pearce is accepting clients with valid claims against Dawson James and Spartan stockbrokers who may have engaged in broker misconduct and caused investors’ losses. The most important of investors’ rights is the right to be informed! This Investors’ Rights blog post is by the Law Offices of Robert Wayne Pearce, P.A., located in Boca Raton, Florida. For over 40 years, Attorney Pearce has tried, arbitrated, and mediated hundreds of disputes involving complex securities, commodities and investment law issues. The lawyers at our law firm are devoted to protecting investors’ rights throughout the United States and internationally! Please visit our website, www.secatty.com, post a comment, call (800) 732-2889, or email Mr. Pearce at pearce@rwpearce.com for answers to any of your questions about this blog post and/or any related matter.

Continue Reading

Alexander Capital Stockbroker Jody Ethan Thompson Suspended for Excessive and Unsuitable Trading

Jody Ethan Thompson of Seaford, New York submitted a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent (AWC) to the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) in which he allegedly exercised discretionary trading and made unsuitable recommendations in violation of NASD Rule 2510 and FINRA Rules 2111 and 2010. From July 2015 to February 2019, Jody Ethan Thompson was registered with Alexander Capital as a General Securities Representative. According to the FINRA findings, Thompson made unsuitable recommendations to three different customers without understanding the potential risks and rewards of the various offerings. The findings stated that Thompson did not understand the restrictions on transfer and withdrawal of the investments, how the interest payments would be made to investors or the fee structure of the investments because he did not perform reasonable diligence. The FINRA findings also stated that Thompson allegedly exercised discretion by placing 40 trades in a customer’s account without written authorization from the customer or from Alexander Capital.

Continue Reading

Crown Capital Securities Fined for Failing to Establish and Maintain Supervisory Procedures

Crown Capital in Orange, California, submitted a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver, and Consent (AWC) to the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) in which the firm was censured and fined $75,000 for allegedly failing to establish and maintain a supervisory system, including written supervisory procedures, for reviewing and monitoring mutual fund switches conducted by representatives in violation of NASD Rule 3010(a), NASD Rule 3010(b), and FINRA Rule 2010. Crown Capital is a dually registered broker-dealer and investment advisor and has been a member of FINRA since July 5, 1999. According to the FINRA findings, Crown Capital had no supervisory mechanism in place and relied upon the registered representative to alert the firm of a mutual fund switch, which two representatives failed to do. The findings stated that one representative effected 61 short-term mutual fund switch transactions in a customer’s accounts which resulted in unnecessary front-end sales loads of between 3.75 and 5.75% with each new purchase and losses of approximately $5,000. During the same period, the other representative effected 49 Class A and two non-Class A short-term mutual fund switch transactions for four customers which also resulted in paid front-end sales loads of between 3.75 and 5.75% with each new purchase and losses of approximately $390,000. In addition to the findings, Crown Capital voluntarily compensated the customers who sustained losses due to the unsuitable recommendations, paying a total of approximately $395,000 in restitution.

Continue Reading

Did Eric Weschke of Kalos Capital Sell You Any GPB Fund?

Let Us Help You Recover Your GPB Investment Losses! Eric Peter Weschke has been employed by Kalos Capital, Inc. and Weschke Wealth Management in Setauket, New York since 2011.  During his illustrious securities industry career as a salesperson he has managed to be the subject of two regulatory complaints and fourteen customer complaints. Ohio denied him registration in the state because it “determined that Weschke was not of good business repute.”  Nine of those arbitrations were settled in the investors’ favor, two were denied and three remain pending.  We believe all of the pending complaints relate to Mr. Weschke’s private offer and sale of GPB Capital Holdings sponsored limited partnership interests. We are attorneys offering to help GPB investors who made private placement investments in the following limited partnerships offered and sold by Mr. Weschke during his employment with Kalos Capital, Inc.; that is, help them to rescind their GPB investment and/or recover their GPB investment losses: GPB Automotive Portfolio, LP GPB Cold Storage LP GPB Holdings, LP GPB Holdings II, LP GPB Holdings III, LP GPB Holdings Qualified, LP GPB NYC Development, LP GPB Waste Management Fund, LP

Continue Reading

Did Dustin Shafer of Newbridge Securities and formerly with Money Concepts Capital Sell You Any GPB Fund?

Let Us Help You Recover Your GPB Investment Losses! Dustin Shafer is currently employed by Newbridge Securities Corporation in Springfield, Illinois. During the period 2008 through 2019 he was registered with Money Concepts Capital Corp. in the same city. During Mr. Shafer’s securities industry career as a salesperson he has been the subject of seven customer complaints. His BrokerCheck Report also discloses six Judgement/Liens. We believe the two pending complaints relate to Mr. Shafer’s private offer and sale of GPB Capital Holdings sponsored limited partnership interests while his was associated with Money Concepts Capital. We are attorneys offering to help GPB investors who made private placement investments in the following limited partnerships offered and sold by Mr. Shafer during his employment with Money Concepts Capital Corp. ; that is, help them to rescind their GPB investment and/or recover their GPB investment losses: GPB Automotive Portfolio, LP GPB Cold Storage LP GPB Holdings, LP GPB Holdings II, LP GPB Holdings III, LP GPB Holdings Qualified, LP GPB NYC Development, LP GPB Waste Management Fund, LP

Continue Reading

Did Daryl Serizawa of Woodbury Financial Services Sell You Any GPB Fund?

Let Us Help You Recover Your GPB Investment Losses! Daryl Serizawa is currently employed by Woodbury Financial Services in Irvine, California. During the period 2012 through 2017 he was registered with Independent Financial Group in the same city. During Mr. Serizawa’s securities industry career as a salesperson he has been the subject of three customer complaints. One of those arbitrations was settled, one was denied and the third involving Mr. Serizawa and Woodbury Financial Services is still pending. We believe the pending complaint relates to Mr. Serizawa’s private offer and sale of GPB Capital Holdings sponsored limited partnership interests. We are attorneys offering to help GPB investors who made private placement investments in the following limited partnerships offered and sold by Mr. Serizawa during his employment with Woodbury Financial Services and the Independent Financial Group; that is, help them to rescind their GPB investment and/or recover their GPB investment losses: GPB Automotive Portfolio, LP GPB Cold Storage LP GPB Holdings, LP GPB Holdings II, LP GPB Holdings III, LP GPB Holdings Qualified, LP GPB NYC Development, LP GPB Waste Management Fund, LP

Continue Reading

Did Sean Kelly formerly employed by Center Street and Capital Financial Sell You Any GPB Fund Investments?

Let Us Help You Recover Your GPB Investment Losses Sean Joseph Kelly was formerly employed by Center Street Securities, Inc, and before that at Capital Financial Services, Inc. and other brokerages. During Mr. Kelly’s securities industry career as a salesperson he  has been criminally convicted and imprisoned for securities fraud, permanently enjoined and barred by the SEC from the securities industry, and the subject of six customer complaints. We believe two of these complaints relate to Mr. Kelly’s private offer and sale of GPB Capital Holdings sponsored limited partnership interests. We are attorneys offering to help GPB investors who made private placement investments in the following limited partnerships offered and sold by Mr. Kelly during his employment with Center Street Securities and Capital Financial Services; that is, help them to rescind their GPB investment and/or recover their GPB investment losses: GPB Automotive Portfolio, LP GPB Cold Storage LP GPB Holdings, LP GPB Holdings II, LP GPB Holdings III, LP GPB Holdings Qualified, LP GPB NYC Development, LP GPB Waste Management Fund, LP

Continue Reading

Former Cape Securities Stockbroker Kevin Kimball Meadows Suspended for Excessive and Unsuitable Trading

Kevin Kimball Meadows of Columbus, Georgia submitted a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent (AWC) to the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) in which he was fined and suspended for allegedly engaging in excessive and unsuitable transactions in violation of FINRA Rules 2111 and 2010. In June 2013, Kevin Kimball Meadows joined Cape Securities as a general securities representative. According to the FINRA findings, Meadows excessively and unsuitably traded three accounts of a  customer. FINRA found that during the relevant period, one account had a turnover rate as high as 10.10 and a cost-to-equity ratio as high as 53 percent, the second account had a turnover rate as high as 7.93 and a cost-to-equity ratio as high as 44 percent and the third account had a turnover rate as high as 6.93 and a cost-to-equity as high as 37 percent resulting in a total loss of approximately $39,671. In addition to the FINRA findings, the customer represented to FINRA that his risk tolerance was never aggressive, although his documents with Cape reflected that his investment objective was capital appreciation/growth with an aggressive risk tolerance.

Continue Reading

Did Darren Wayne Oglesby employed by Money Concepts Capital Corp. Sell You Any GPB Fund?

Let Us Help You Recover Your GPB Investment Losses! Darren Wayne Oglesby is currently employed by Money Concepts Capital Corp. in Monroe, Louisiana.  During Mr. Oglesby’s securities industry career as a salesperson he has been the subject of three (3) customer complaints.   We believe one of the complaints relates to a private offer and sale of GPB Capital Holdings sponsored limited partnership interests which is pending. We are attorneys offering to help GPB  investors who made private placement investments in the following limited partnerships offered and sold by Darren Wayne Oglesby during his employment with Money Concepts Capital Corp.; that is, help them to rescind their GPB investment and/or recover their GPB investment losses: GPB Automotive Portfolio, LP GPB Cold Storage LP GPB Holdings, LP GPB Holdings II, LP GPB Holdings III, LP GPB Holdings Qualified, LP GPB NYC Development, LP GPB Waste Management Fund, LP

Continue Reading