Our firm is investigating Tamara Beatrice Huey (CRD# 2174723), a financial advisor with Ameriprise Financial Services, LLC working out of San Diego, California, for potential investment-related misconduct.
Financial Advisor’s Career History
Based on the BrokerCheck report, Tamara Beatrice Huey has been registered with Ameriprise Financial Services, LLC since April/May 1999. Her recent employment history lists:
- Ameriprise Financial Services, LLC — Registered Rep (03/2020–Present) — San Diego, CA
- Ameriprise Financial Services, Inc. — Registered Rep (09/2005–03/2020) — San Diego, CA
Her prior securities registrations include IDS Life Insurance Company (04/1999–07/2006), Wells Fargo Securities Inc. (02/1995–04/1998), and Thomas James Associates, Inc. (09/1991–01/1995).
Tamara Beatrice Huey Fraud Allegations and Investor Complaints Explained
BrokerCheck reflects one customer dispute disclosure for Tamara Beatrice Huey.
Disclosure summary (for context)
- Customer Dispute (Pending) — Allegation: unsuitable recommendation — Product: “Micro Strategy Stock” — Alleged damages: $99,000 — Complaint received: 12/09/2025 — Forum: FINRA arbitration (San Diego, CA) — Case No. 25-02694 — Status: Pending.
H3: Pending FINRA arbitration alleging unsuitable recommendation (MicroStrategy stock)
According to the BrokerCheck narrative, the claimant alleges that an unsuitable investment was recommended by the advisor, identified as “Micro Strategy Stock,” with alleged damages of $99,000. The complaint and arbitration filing date are listed as December 9, 2025, in FINRA arbitration seated in San Diego, California (Case No. 25-02694).
To obtain a copy of Tamara Beatrice Huey’s FINRA BrokerCheck report, visit this link.
Robert Wayne Pearce Is Committed to Recovering Your Investment Losses
FINRA Rule 2111 (Suitability) requires that a broker/advisor have a reasonable basis to believe a recommendation is suitable for a customer based on the customer’s investment profile. In a complaint alleging an unsuitable recommendation tied to MicroStrategy stock, the key suitability questions typically include whether the recommendation aligned with the claimant’s objectives and risk tolerance, whether position sizing/concentration was appropriate, and whether the advisor had an adequate basis to recommend the security given the customer’s circumstances.
FINRA Rule 2090 (Know Your Customer) generally requires members to use reasonable diligence to know the essential facts about each customer and the authority of each person acting on behalf of the customer. Where a claimant alleges an unsuitable recommendation, KYC diligence is often central because suitability analysis depends on accurate, current customer information—such as financial situation, investment objectives, and other profile facts that inform whether a recommendation was appropriate in the first place.
FINRA Rule 2010 (Standards of Commercial Honor and Principles of Trade) broadly requires brokers to observe high standards of commercial honor and just and equitable principles of trade. Allegations that an advisor recommended an unsuitable investment can implicate Rule 2010 when the surrounding conduct suggests a failure to act consistent with those standards—such as making a recommendation without an adequate suitability basis, failing to properly consider the customer’s profile, or otherwise engaging in sales-practice conduct that FINRA deems inconsistent with just and equitable principles.
Losing your savings to a dishonest broker or advisor can be devastating, but you do not have to face it alone. Robert Wayne Pearce and his team have spent over four decades helping investors who were misled or defrauded by Wall Street firms. The Law Offices of Robert Wayne Pearce, P.A. takes cases nationwide on a contingency fee basis. You pay nothing unless we recover your losses. Call (800) 732-2889 or email pearce@rwpearce.com today for a free and confidential consultation.